Discussion of designs

Design #656989 (Fanolj Ademi): What we like: The graphic isto the left of the brand name. A black and white image was included. Thedistinction between the words in the brand name is clear when the image isblack and white.

Design #657712 (Zdesign): We like the globe. We wouldlike to see a grayscale version and a version without a catch phrase.

Design #657731 (logo craft production): We would like tosee a grayscale version. Also seems a little too complicated.

Design #658625 (Alex Silva): We like the infinity sign.Please put it to the left of the brand name and remove that catch phrase. Also,we would like to see a sample on a black white ground as well as a whitebackground.

Design #658699 (Breanne Owen): We like the logo on thebottom better. Also, the logo is too complex right now (the silhouettes seem tobe a cause). Could you also give us a sample on a black background as well?

Design #659127 (Deniz Demir): See comments above. Also,the sample on the white background is difficult to read.

Design #659339 (design2012): We really like the firstversion of this logo that was produced (657127). Please include two logos: oneon a white background and one on a black one. We like how the graphic ties withthe collaborative community industry. We would like to see how the graphiclooks as a gray scale image. This design was consistently in our top three.